I can never completely agree with the no side or the yes side.
I agree with the yes side because I think everyone deserves a second chance. I mean really, Darfur themselves, really haven't gotten their own chance. They just get the short end of the stick because of Iraq's behavior in the past.
The no side had made a point that the US already was "proved catastrophically wrong in Iraq" why would it be any different now, and what has changed since then. This part I don't agree with. I think everyone deserves a chance, but that is more of a moral conscious decision. I also agree with the no side because it is dangerous for our troops. We think we are "so irresistbile" that these questions shouldn't be taken into account. So I definatly agree that we risk a lot more than we think, and should...Sometimes I think the only reason we do so, is because there is nothing else to do..?? This side also had a lot more reasons why Davis Rieff didn't believe we should send US peackeeping troops to Darfur.
"Okayyyy, so I guess I agree more with the NO side than the Yes side..." ;)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment